Scientific journals

Data published in scientific journals are generally taken from recent studies conducted by the authors. The random samples are not always representative, since studies are often able to consider only sub-populations relevant to the issues that they address. Likewise, the dimensions studied anthropometrically are generally selected purely with respect to the scientific problem at hand. This is the case not only for ergonomic studies, but also for many biological and medical studies, for example into the causes of obesity. Collections of data that are representative and important above all for designers and similar users rarely appear in scientific publications.

Overview of sources of data on body dimensions
Type DIN/EN and ISO standards Manuals Scientific journals
Characteristics
  • Large random samples
  • Data are rarely up to date 
  • Complex collection of data (dimensions)
  • User-oriented/information on use
  • Percentile values are stated
  • Information on random samples differs
  • Data are rarely up to date 
  • Complex or selected collections of data (dimensions)
  • User-oriented/information on use
  • Percentile values are stated
  • Small random samples 
  • Data are up to date
  • Selected collections of data (dimensions)
  • Not user-oriented/no information on use
  • Statistically divergent data
Examples
  • CEN ISO/TR 7250-2:2013-08
  • DIN 33402-2:2005-12
  • DIN 33402-2 Ber 1:2007-05
  • EN 547-3:2009-01
  • EN ISO 14738:2009-07
    ...
  • Anthropologischer Atlas
  • Handbuch der Ergonomie
  • Kleine ergonomische Datensammlung
    ...
  • Anthropologischer Anzeiger
  • Annals of Human Biology
  • Ergonomics
  • Applied Ergonomics
    ...

To top